StakingMarketRegulationCryptostake ExplainsUncharted
The Role and the Importance of Securities-Specific Blockchain, Explained

The reason behind slow adoption of blockchain by financial institutions

Despite blockchain's promising capabilities, its adoption within financial sectors has been gradual. Institutions are intrigued yet hesitant, largely due to regulatory ambiguities and infrastructural incompatibilities. Deloitte's 2021 Global Blockchain Survey highlights this curiosity, with nearly 80% of participants predicting digital assets' significance in their industries within a year. However, hurdles remain:

Identity concerns: 

Blockchain's pseudonymity clashes with financial compliance needs, creating identity verification challenges.

Governance issues: 

Ethereum's hard forks during upgrades pose governance and stability risks.

Compliance obstacles: 

The architecture of blockchain technologies can limit transaction capabilities, hindering full compliance.

This cautious approach underscores the need for a blockchain solution tailored to the specific requirements of securities, marrying innovation with regulation.

The rise and challenges of security tokens in finance

Security tokens are emerging as a transformative force in the financial sector, offering a bridge between traditional investment mechanisms and the innovative world of blockchain. They represent regulated assets like equity, real estate, or debt but in a digital format, enabling:

Fractional ownership: 

Investors can own parts of an asset, enhancing liquidity and accessibility.

Tokenized cash flows: 

Unique investment opportunities in specific company revenues or real estate equity become possible.

However, despite their potential, security tokens face significant adoption barriers:

Identity verification: 

Aligning with KYC (Know Your Customer) regulations without sacrificing blockchain's anonymity.


Navigating the complexities of digital asset regulation and management.


Ensuring security tokens adhere to existing financial laws, which many regulators are still grappling with.

These challenges highlight the delicate balance between leveraging blockchain's benefits and meeting institutional standards.

Bridging the gap: security tokens and institutional standards

The integration of security tokens into mainstream finance hinges on addressing key institutional concerns. The ERC-1400 standard represents a significant stride towards this goal, offering:


A unified framework for issuing and managing security tokens on the Ethereum blockchain, facilitating compliance and interoperability.


Although challenges persist, ERC-1400 aims to enhance the scalability of security tokens to meet institutional needs.

Despite these advancements, critical issues remain unresolved:

Clearance and settlement: 

The process for clearing and settling public securities on blockchain is under debate, with regulatory perspectives varying on the use of off-chain vs. on-chain solutions.

Regulatory acceptance: 

The full embracement of blockchain by regulators for record-keeping and transaction validation is still a contentious issue.

Addressing these concerns is paramount for the successful institutional adoption of security tokens, requiring continued innovation and dialogue between technologists and regulators.

The future of securities on blockchain

Key considerations for the widespread adoption of blockchain in securities include:

Regulatory alignment: 

Ensuring that digital securities comply with global financial regulations is essential for their acceptance and integration.

Technical scalability: 

Addressing the limitations of current blockchain platforms to handle the complexity and volume of securities transactions.

The journey towards a blockchain-driven securities market is underway, with ERC-1400 leading the charge. As we look forward, collaboration between regulators, technologists, and financial institutions will be critical in shaping a secure, efficient, and inclusive global securities ecosystem.